Top ↑ | Archive | Why does what do question this yes? | Something Smells Fishy Hereabouts [about]

soyface:

torayot:

Two topics I am interested in are 19th - early 20th century Siam/Thailand and gender dissimulation.

This photographic image from 1900 shows a Siamese woman in traditional dress. She is wearing a loincloth, known as sarong or chongkraben in Thai. This covers the waist to the knees, and is formed with a length of cloth wrapped around the waist and thighs which is then passed through the legs before being secured. She also has the sides of her head shaved, leaving only a topknot and two locks in front of her ears. There is a cord around her shoulder that is looped round her torso, but otherwise her upper body is completely bare, leaving her breasts completely uncovered. Men would also present themselves in a similar way - bare chested, loincloth only, partially shaved head. (Unfortunately I cannot readily find information on Thai non-binary identities and presentation with my limited resources, which makes me sad and frustrated.)

Please observe the next image:

image

(source)

Dating from several decades later, between 1935 - 1945, it is a poster which shows proper Thai dress, as circumscribed by Marshal Plaek Pibulsonggram. He issued a series of Thai cultural mandates (many of which are still de facto in effect today) that described appropriately civilised behaviour as befitting Thai citizens.

The left hand side shows inappropriate dress, which are described in text below the picture. Examples of dress, grooming, and carriage now deemed uncouth include:

  • Wearing a sarong
  • Sporting a completely bare torso
  • Having a shaved head
  • Wearing an “Indian hat” or head covering/wrapping. 
  • Binding one’s chest or wearing only undergarments to partially conceal one’s upper body
  • Carrying loads upon one’s head

Dress and comportment considered acceptable were as follows:

  • Wearing uniforms;
  • “International style” attire
  • ‘Polite’ versions of traditional dress, such as pha sin/pha toong
  • Wearing longer hair
  • Ensuring they wear presentable garments which are clean and neat

These orders were applicable to everyone.

Notice that they clearly erase any ethnic and cultural markers (indeed, the mandates explictly erased all identities and referred to all Thailanders as “Thai”) and, returning to the topic at hand, dissimulated gender by prescribing hair and dress according to norms which could perhaps be described as recognisably Euro-American.

One day I will do more research on why and how this came about, &c.

Ahhh oh my god this is so amazing and i want to know so much more about it.

This is indeed very interesting.

(via tranqualizer)

  1. just-one-mx reblogged this from non-westernhistoricalfashion
  2. afrochan reblogged this from non-westernhistoricalfashion
  3. quothe-the-raven reblogged this from torayot
  4. gladiolasandfistpumps reblogged this from non-westernhistoricalfashion
  5. inspirationandreference reblogged this from howllor
  6. cestlafemmenoire reblogged this from mercurialme
  7. behinroozbeh reblogged this from littlethistlecake
  8. littlethistlecake reblogged this from faysbook
  9. lordaardvark reblogged this from faysbook
  10. thechronicleofshe reblogged this from faysbook and added:
    Man, fuck that guy
  11. mercurialme reblogged this from faysbook
  12. faysbook reblogged this from mattachinereview
  13. shitthatinspires reblogged this from non-westernhistoricalfashion
  14. evelark reblogged this from obscenepromqueen
  15. osechieveryday reblogged this from torayot
  16. tuataras reblogged this from non-westernhistoricalfashion
  17. iamfree-123 reblogged this from midnightcode
  18. midnightcode reblogged this from grrlyman
  19. deadladyofclowntown reblogged this from poorlycopingqueer
  20. unconforming reblogged this from -osito
  21. herebetrouble reblogged this from jhameia
  22. hanyadikez reblogged this from prawnmael
  23. prawnmael reblogged this from obscenepromqueen
  24. asystoles reblogged this from -osito